Yes that’s sort of what I am asking. Lots of things are ‘state-of-the-art’, but that doesn’t tell me anything. Certainly feels like they could be a great primitive, yet there isn’t much uptake from the dev community. It’s not a criticism, just describing what I see.
I’m trying to get a handle on what type of situations are well suited to web components. Reusability is a clear benefit. That sounds great.
I’m also interested to see how they enable/promote progressive enhancement. Anything there would be awesome.
Coding is as much a matter of personal growth as it is of logic and control-flow. I keep patience, curiosity, & exuberance in the same toolbox as vim and git.
*Opinions posted are my own*
Framework Zealots: wEb CoMpOnEnTs ArE uSeLeSs AnD dUmB
VMware: ships web components Salesforce: ships web components GitHub: ships web components
03:58 AM - 11 Oct 2019
Apple, Aqovia, EA, Forter, GitHub, Google, IBM, ING, Maersk, Microsoft, Mozilla, Nintendo, Rabobank, Red Hat, Salesforce, SpaceX, VMware, Williams-Sonoma and others all ship web components.
I wouldn’t be a good developer and engineer if I didn’t point out the irony of you brushing off the ‘common view’ on frontend frameworks as Twitter noise, right after justifying your point of view using a Twitter thread.
However having said that, I do note that the fellow you quoted does have a very well written and convincing blog post covering reasons to use web components:
I’d like to see some articles from the engineering teams of these companies that are apparently using web components. Why aren’t they talking about it?
It’s odd that so many big companies are using them, yet there are close to zero job adverts looking for devs with web components experience. I have been looking at A LOT of job adverts recently so I know that to be the case.
Lead Developer, business owner, US Army veteran. I build things for the web. My website is a bunch of HTML pages that didn't need a framework. Yours can be too!
I've used them for about 2 years and LOVE them (to the point I'm getting self-concious that all of my comments are about web components... It's NOT a silver bullet! Sometimes old-school frameworks are useful too, just like sometimes you might find a reason to use jQuery in this day and age)
The problem may be that they're all using web components under the hood in various helpers: Stencil is my flavor of component compiler (built by the Ionic team... The reason Ionic v4+ is multi-framework and not just Angular? Web components)
Salesforce has been using web components for almost 6 years: Lightning Web Components.
Apple used Stencil in part of Apple Music (among other things), but it's just a part of the app. Github's components are called Catalyst, and the web components re-imagining of Bootstrap is called shoelace.
This stuff is all over the place, but sometimes it's realizing the tech being used behind the scenes, because the selling point isn't necessarily the tech involved, but the flexibility, and in some cases the creator's intent is to supplement the current status quo of frameworks, not upend it, so in some instances they might not even make it clear it's built on the Web Components spec. So the job post might SAY "Ionic" or "Salesforce" or what have you, but what that MEANS is web components.
That said, the Ionic team has been very active on Twitter and blogs talking about how important their decision to run with web components was.
I don't build Ionic apps, but man have I loved Stencil.
Coding is as much a matter of personal growth as it is of logic and control-flow. I keep patience, curiosity, & exuberance in the same toolbox as vim and git.
*Opinions posted are my own*
Thanks for your reply.
Yes that’s sort of what I am asking. Lots of things are ‘state-of-the-art’, but that doesn’t tell me anything. Certainly feels like they could be a great primitive, yet there isn’t much uptake from the dev community. It’s not a criticism, just describing what I see.
I’m trying to get a handle on what type of situations are well suited to web components. Reusability is a clear benefit. That sounds great.
I’m also interested to see how they enable/promote progressive enhancement. Anything there would be awesome.
Apple, Aqovia, EA, Forter, GitHub, Google, IBM, ING, Maersk, Microsoft, Mozilla, Nintendo, Rabobank, Red Hat, Salesforce, SpaceX, VMware, Williams-Sonoma and others all ship web components.
chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/p...
10% of all Chrome page loads used custom elements
The perception among developers that React is king and web components aren't at all used is just twitter noise, nothing more.
I wouldn’t be a good developer and engineer if I didn’t point out the irony of you brushing off the ‘common view’ on frontend frameworks as Twitter noise, right after justifying your point of view using a Twitter thread.
However having said that, I do note that the fellow you quoted does have a very well written and convincing blog post covering reasons to use web components:
log.rockerest.com/post/why-i-use-w...
I’d like to see some articles from the engineering teams of these companies that are apparently using web components. Why aren’t they talking about it?
It’s odd that so many big companies are using them, yet there are close to zero job adverts looking for devs with web components experience. I have been looking at A LOT of job adverts recently so I know that to be the case.
I've used them for about 2 years and LOVE them (to the point I'm getting self-concious that all of my comments are about web components... It's NOT a silver bullet! Sometimes old-school frameworks are useful too, just like sometimes you might find a reason to use jQuery in this day and age)
The problem may be that they're all using web components under the hood in various helpers: Stencil is my flavor of component compiler (built by the Ionic team... The reason Ionic v4+ is multi-framework and not just Angular? Web components)
Salesforce has been using web components for almost 6 years: Lightning Web Components.
Apple used Stencil in part of Apple Music (among other things), but it's just a part of the app. Github's components are called Catalyst, and the web components re-imagining of Bootstrap is called shoelace.
This stuff is all over the place, but sometimes it's realizing the tech being used behind the scenes, because the selling point isn't necessarily the tech involved, but the flexibility, and in some cases the creator's intent is to supplement the current status quo of frameworks, not upend it, so in some instances they might not even make it clear it's built on the Web Components spec. So the job post might SAY "Ionic" or "Salesforce" or what have you, but what that MEANS is web components.
That said, the Ionic team has been very active on Twitter and blogs talking about how important their decision to run with web components was.
I don't build Ionic apps, but man have I loved Stencil.
That's a great point! Not many devs write blog posts about
querySelector, but that doesn't mean it's "unpopular" or to be avoided.Perhaps we should just start calling them secret web components from now on.
These secret web components sure sound great.