The pipe operator should support a FP approach to development where the dot syntax supports an OOP approach:
foo().bar(1, 2)
foo() |> bar(1, 2)
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
The pipe operator should support a FP approach to development where the dot syntax supports an OOP approach:
Should call the method bar/2 on the object returned
from the function foo/0
foo().bar(1, 2)
Should pass the object returned by function foo/0
as the first param on the function bar/3
foo() |> bar(1, 2)