There are much fish ((f)riendly (i)nteractive (sh)ell) users because of the autocompletion, syntax highlighting etc. But actually fish is much less compatible with other shells. For example, ZSH & Bash are really similar, and they can interop with "many" scripts. You can get similar features using plugins. I do not think there is a reason to use fish.
I use both fish and bash. Fish is my term shell and bash is my scripting shell.
I agree with you on fish not being compliant with bash and other bourne shells. That's because fish isn't 100% POSIX compliant.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
There are much fish ((f)riendly (i)nteractive (sh)ell) users because of the autocompletion, syntax highlighting etc. But actually fish is much less compatible with other shells. For example, ZSH & Bash are really similar, and they can interop with "many" scripts. You can get similar features using plugins. I do not think there is a reason to use fish.
I use both fish and bash. Fish is my term shell and bash is my scripting shell.
I agree with you on fish not being compliant with bash and other bourne shells. That's because fish isn't 100% POSIX compliant.