Since xor and subtraction were already mentioned, may I chime in with a circular shift over the 64 bit value of the whole function memory?
I love you
This one is different, but how exactly would you implement it in a programming language?
Basically, it works like this (x64 assembler):
mov rax, [m64] ror rax, 32 mov [m64], rax
No, I mean on a high level programming language which you have no idea where is stored.
Even for an assembly, the two variables could potentially be stored in two different registers. But we're going to assume not!
Cool idea anyways
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Since xor and subtraction were already mentioned, may I chime in with a circular shift over the 64 bit value of the whole function memory?
I love you
This one is different, but how exactly would you implement it in a programming language?
Basically, it works like this (x64 assembler):
mov rax, [m64]
ror rax, 32
mov [m64], rax
No, I mean on a high level programming language which you have no idea where is stored.
Even for an assembly, the two variables could potentially be stored in two different registers. But we're going to assume not!
Cool idea anyways