Thanks, that's helpful. But the "yahoo" could be anything, when we call .populate("field name of Authors"). There are something still not clear. However, I get over it by modify data type of _id field.
MERN Stack Developer & Certified Neo4j Professional with over 5 years of experience. Love to learn and build new things. When not coding, you can find me exploring new tech, games & books.
MERN Stack Developer & Certified Neo4j Professional with over 5 years of experience. Love to learn and build new things. When not coding, you can find me exploring new tech, games & books.
Hi Neural. I don't think, we can find or filter items based on populated items. It may also slow down the query as well.
I would say, go for aggregation, because in aggregation we have better control over how we structure and filter data in different steps. Populate is good for simple to intermediate scenarios but aggregation is more helpful when you need to handle a little complex to advance scenarios
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Thanks, that's helpful. But the "yahoo" could be anything, when we call
.populate("field name of Authors"). There are something still not clear. However, I get over it by modify data type of _id field.Good...things are not 100% clear to me as well...but I am sure after trying and testing we can understand it better :)
Hello paras wanted to know how you can find or filter items based on the populated items
Hi Neural. I don't think, we can find or filter items based on populated items. It may also slow down the query as well.
I would say, go for aggregation, because in aggregation we have better control over how we structure and filter data in different steps. Populate is good for simple to intermediate scenarios but aggregation is more helpful when you need to handle a little complex to advance scenarios