Full-time web dev; JS lover since 2002; CSS fanatic. #CSSIsAwesome
I try to stay up with new web platform features. Web feature you don't understand? Tell me! I'll write an article!
He/him
I think a nice way to ensure objects are immutable is to use a closure when constructing them and only return getter methods, like in Douglas Crockford’s constructor example.
Yes can be, immutable by default but at the same time giving the option to developers of make some value mutable, similar at how mut keyword work in Rust, I like that approach, in this way you can work with mutable data but immutability would be the main paradigm in this issue
So imagining that it was recursive, would you want immutability to be the default behavior rather than having to apply it with a method?
I guess he wants const to really mean constant =)
I think a nice way to ensure objects are immutable is to use a closure when constructing them and only return getter methods, like in Douglas Crockford’s constructor example.
Yes can be, immutable by default but at the same time giving the option to developers of make some value mutable, similar at how
mutkeyword work in Rust, I like that approach, in this way you can work with mutable data but immutability would be the main paradigm in this issueMakes sense. I’d like that feature in JS.