Jon is a self-taught programmer, started in video games but now does web development. He follows principles, argues for scientific software development, and does not like writing in the 3rd person.
I only know the theory, but I think the scenario setup can be abstracted in the direction you talk about it in the office. That is, do you go around saying “let’s make a great notification feature for posts with notifications enabled and permissions are allowed and the user clicks etc etc”? No, you have some shorthand that the organisation accepts (or is ready to adopt). Internal language can have deep meaningful abstractions and that worth capitalising on. The BDD part of Gurkins is to identify those ways of talking.
Well, I think so at any rate. I think your question is really good and gets to the heart of the complexities with full behavioural test coverage.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I only know the theory, but I think the scenario setup can be abstracted in the direction you talk about it in the office. That is, do you go around saying “let’s make a great notification feature for posts with notifications enabled and permissions are allowed and the user clicks etc etc”? No, you have some shorthand that the organisation accepts (or is ready to adopt). Internal language can have deep meaningful abstractions and that worth capitalising on. The BDD part of Gurkins is to identify those ways of talking.
Well, I think so at any rate. I think your question is really good and gets to the heart of the complexities with full behavioural test coverage.