Totally agree with the "StackOverflow density" metric of language evaluation. If someone says "language X is better than Y because StackOverflow density" it's perhaps the only such sentence I'd take into consideration.
Head of Product at Temporal. Previously lead architect and low-level systems programmer for scale out SaaS offering. Game engine developer, ML engineering expert. DMs open on Twitter.
Totally agree with the "StackOverflow density" metric of language evaluation. If someone says "language X is better than Y because StackOverflow density" it's perhaps the only such sentence I'd take into consideration.
StackOverflow density has really become a metric for the success of a software product. Glad you appreciated that part! Thanks for reading.