I'm sorry, I missed the fact that the image is turned upside down (more recent commits are lower), and that arrows follow time rather than actual references (commits points to their parents, not to their children), i.e. they are reversed to what I expected, but what might be not intuitive.
I'm sorry, I missed the fact that the image is turned upside down (more recent commits are lower), and that arrows follow time rather than actual references (commits points to their parents, not to their children), i.e. they are reversed to what I expected, but what might be not intuitive.
Now I get the confusion. Makes sense