re: Please don't "overchain" array methods VIEW POST

re: Which means it needs to allocate the whole range, as an internal implementation. I feel like whatever optimizations you can get out of hiding that ...

It isn't hidden, it won't compile if the range doesn't provide the needed operations. The simpilist solution is to call .array() before the call to sort.

Aw yiss, get that D!
Homegirl on a mission.

Also: Oh no, this competes with Rust in a number of usecases, better say bad things about it all around just in case.

Also: Vector operations look sweet.

code of conduct - report abuse