Hangfire is def the defacto right now. Coravel was never built as a direct alternative, but many have pointed out that it's much easier to use.
Also, Coravel supports true async jobs, whereas Hangfire doesn't actually support true async jobs. So all that I/O in your background jobs will actually block your threads ðĪŠ.
So, the answer to your question is "yes and no". There's an open issue here that I have on the todo list.
I offered a temporary/potential solution for now in that issue. Basically, you would just manage the tasks in a collection yourself. Coravel gives you some lower-level methods to start/stop any jobs you want (although, it's a workaround of sorts until there is an actual feature added ð).
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Hangfire is def the defacto right now. Coravel was never built as a direct alternative, but many have pointed out that it's much easier to use.
Also, Coravel supports true async jobs, whereas Hangfire doesn't actually support true async jobs. So all that I/O in your background jobs will actually block your threads ðĪŠ.
See here for more
So, the answer to your question is "yes and no". There's an open issue here that I have on the todo list.
I offered a temporary/potential solution for now in that issue. Basically, you would just manage the tasks in a collection yourself. Coravel gives you some lower-level methods to start/stop any jobs you want (although, it's a workaround of sorts until there is an actual feature added ð).