DEV Community

Cover image for Kubernetes alternatives to work on locally
Israel Blancas
Israel Blancas

Posted on

Kubernetes alternatives to work on locally

When you鈥檙e developing something, you need to create a development environment to test what you are coding. If you鈥檙e working on a Kubernetes application, you will need to create a local development environment using Kubernetes. There are some alternatives and we鈥檒l take a look at the most famous ones.

Minikube, Kind, k0s, and k3s are all popular options for running a local Kubernetes cluster. Each has its own unique features and advantages, making them suitable for different use cases.

Minikube

Minikube is one of the most widely used tools for running a single-node Kubernetes cluster on a local machine. It is easy to set up and use, making it a great option for developers who are new to Kubernetes. Is considered by many as the best alternative for running a local Kubernetes cluster for several reasons:

  • Ease of Use: Minikube is very easy to set up and use, making it a great option for developers who are new to Kubernetes. It includes a simple command-line interface that allows users to start, stop, and manage the cluster.
  • Platform Support: Minikube supports multiple virtualization options, including VirtualBox, Hyper-V, and KVM, and can run on Windows, Mac, and Linux. This makes it accessible to a wide range of users and developers.
  • Development Environment: Minikube allows developers to test and debug their applications in a local Kubernetes environment, which is similar to the production environment. This helps to reduce the risk of issues that may arise when deploying to a live cluster.
  • Add-Ons: Minikube supports a variety of add-ons, such as Kubernetes Dashboard, Heapster, and Ingress, which can be easily enabled and configured.
  • Community Support: Minikube is an open-source project with a large and active community, which means that users have access to a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support from other users.

But it has some downsides such as:

  • Limited scalability: Since Minikube runs a single-node cluster, it is not suitable for large-scale or high-traffic applications. It also lacks the ability to add more nodes to the cluster, which limits its ability to handle more resources and services.
  • Limited production-like environment: Minikube is primarily designed for development and testing purposes. It may not fully replicate the production environment, and there may be differences in the behavior of the application.
  • Limited support for certain features: Minikube may not support all Kubernetes features and add-ons that are available in a production cluster. This can limit the ability to test and develop certain types of applications or services.
  • Limited customization: Minikube has a limited set of configuration options, which may not be suitable for certain use cases.
  • Limited hardware support: Minikube does not support all types of hardware, such as ARM processors, and is not well suited for Edge and IoT devices.

Overall, Minikube is a versatile, easy-to-use, and well-supported tool for running a local Kubernetes cluster, making it a great option for developers and teams of all skill levels.

Kind

Kind, short for "Kubernetes IN Docker", is another popular option for running a local Kubernetes cluster. It uses Docker containers to create a multi-node cluster, making it more suitable for testing and development. Kind is also easy to set up and use, and it supports running multiple clusters on the same machine.

It became more popular very fast because of these advantages:

  • Flexibility: Kind uses Docker containers to create a multi-node cluster, which makes it more flexible than Minikube. It allows users to easily create and manage multiple clusters on the same machine, making it a great option for testing and development.
  • Reproducibility: Kind uses a consistent and reproducible environment since it creates clusters using Docker containers. This makes it easy to create and test different configurations and ensures that the cluster behaves the same way across different environments.
  • Community Support: Kind is an open-source project with a large and active community, which means that users have access to a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support from other users.
  • Containerized Kubernetes: Kind is built on top of Docker and provides a containerized version of Kubernetes. This makes it easy to manage and update the version of Kubernetes in use.
  • Support for Kubernetes features: Kind supports all Kubernetes features and is compatible with most Kubernetes manifests, and add-ons, this makes it a good option for the development and testing of different types of applications and services.

But is not perfect:

  • Resource-intensive: Since Kind uses containers to create a multi-node cluster, it can be resource-intensive, especially when running multiple clusters or large numbers of pods. This can be a limitation on systems with limited resources.
  • Limited to Linux: Kind is only supported on Linux systems, which limits its accessibility to users and developers working on other operating systems. You can use Docker for Mac and Docker for Windows to make it work on those systems.
  • Networking: Kind uses host networking by default which might not be suitable for certain use cases, like running multiple clusters on the same machine.
  • Limited production-like environment: Kind is primarily designed for development and testing purposes. It may not fully replicate the production environment and there may be differences in the behavior of the application.

k0s

k0s is a relatively new player in the Kubernetes local cluster space.It is great because:

  • Lightweight and easy to use: k0s is designed to be lightweight and easy to use, making it a great option for small teams and edge deployments. It has a small binary size and low resource consumption, making it suitable for running in resource-constrained environments.
  • High availability: k0s is built with high availability in mind, providing automatic failover and self-healing capabilities to ensure the cluster is always up and running.
  • Secure by default: k0s is built with security in mind, providing built-in security features such as automatic certificate rotation, role-based access control, and network segmentation.
  • Extensible and customizable: k0s is built with extensibility and customization in mind, providing a flexible and modular architecture that allows users to easily customize and add new features to the cluster.
  • Support for Kubernetes features: all Kubernetes features are supported in k0s, bringing a great development experience.

But it has handicaps too:

  • Limited community support: k0s is a relatively new and niche Kubernetes distribution, and has a smaller community compared to other popular alternatives such as Minikube, Kind, and k3s. This means that users may have limited access to resources, tutorials, and support from other users.
  • Limited production readiness: k0s is primarily designed for development and testing purposes, and may not be fully production-ready. It may lack certain features and capabilities that are required for running a production-grade cluster.
  • Limited scalability: k0s is designed for small teams and edge deployments, and may not be suitable for large and complex clusters.
  • Limited integration with other tools: k0s may have limited integration with other tools and services, which may make it difficult to integrate it with other technologies in a larger ecosystem.

k3s

k3s is another lightweight Kubernetes distribution, with a focus on being easy to install, operate, and upgrade. It is designed to run on resource-constrained environments like Edge, IoT, and ARM. k3s is well suited for production use in small and mid-sized clusters and can be deployed on-premises, at the edge, or in the cloud.

Some of its characteristics are:

  • High availability: k3s is built with high availability in mind, providing automatic failover and self-healing capabilities to ensure the cluster is always up and running.
  • Secure by default: k3s is built with security in mind, providing built-in security features such as automatic certificate rotation, role-based access control, and network segmentation.
  • Production-ready: k3s is built to be production-ready, providing features such as load balancing and ingress, service discovery and monitoring.
  • Support for Kubernetes features: k3s supports all Kubernetes features and is compatible with most Kubernetes manifests, this makes it a good option for the development and testing of different types of applications and services.
  • Easy to upgrade: k3s has a simple upgrade process, which means that users can easily upgrade the cluster to the latest version of Kubernetes.

But k3s is not an exception. It has some difficulties too:

  • Limited community support: k3s is a relatively new and niche Kubernetes distribution, and has a smaller community compared to other popular alternatives such as Minikube, Kind and k0s. This means that users may have limited access to resources, tutorials, and support from other users.
  • Limited scalability: k3s is designed for small teams and edge deployments, and may not be suitable for large and complex clusters.
  • Limited integration with other tools: k3s may have limited integration with other tools and services, which may make it difficult to integrate it with other technologies in a larger ecosystem.
  • Limited customization: k3s is designed to be easy to use, but it may not offer as much customization as some other alternatives like k0s.
  • Limited performance: k3s is designed to be lightweight, and while it is suitable for small teams and edge deployments, it may not provide the same level of performance as some other alternatives.

In conclusion, minikube, kind, k0s, and k3s are all great options for running a local Kubernetes cluster, each with their own advantages. Minikube is a good choice for developers new to Kubernetes, Kind is great for testing and development, k0s is a good option for small edge and IoT deployments and k3s is well suited for production use in small and mid-sized clusters, edge and IoT deployments. The choice of which to use depends on your specific needs and use case.

Latest comments (6)

Collapse
 
bcouetil profile image
Info Comment hidden by post author - thread only accessible via permalink
Benoit COUETIL 馃挮 • Edited

Hello, thank you for sharing this instructive content.

A small thing is bothering me : why do you write about production, scalability, integration, performance, when your article is for people searching for a local cluster ?

And another question : which one did you test yourself ?

Collapse
 
iblancasa profile image
Israel Blancas

Thanks for reading it.

why to you write about production, scalability, integration, performance, when your article is for people searching for a local cluster ?

It depends on the system you need to run in your machine, right? If it is a regular application, maybe all of them are fine. If you need to run one application with multiple services, observability stack, service mesh, databases and something else...performance and scalability can become important even for local development. Just an example.

which one did you test yourself ?

I have tested all of them. My favorite option? KiND.

Collapse
 
bcouetil profile image
Benoit COUETIL 馃挮 • Edited

If you need to run one application with multiple services, observability stack, service mesh, databases and something else...performance and scalability can become important

I get your point, even if you do not respond fully to my concern, for example you say in the article :

Since Minikube runs a single-node cluster, it is not suitable for large-scale or high-traffic applications

I do not see why, on my computer, a multi node cluster can help over a big fat single node.

But do not worry, that question was not for me, only for you, from a reader perspective to appreciate your detailed article. By the way, minikube can now spin up a multi-nodes cluster. Even if this will not be enough to convince me to use minikube.

Did you try K3D ? I did not try it myself, but that is the one I want to try next, and since you prefer KinD, I would bet on you would like this one too, maybe even better...

Thread Thread
 
iblancasa profile image
Israel Blancas

I do not see why, on my computer, a multi node cluster can help over a big fat single node.

It is a basic principle from horizontal vs vertical scaling.
Also, it depends on what you want to deploy/reproduce. For instance, I work a lot with K8s operators. If I want to do something with multiple DaemonSets.

Thanks for the feedback.

Thread Thread
 
bcouetil profile image
Benoit COUETIL 馃挮 • Edited

Oh great, on a single server, 2 nodes with 8gb ram and 2cpu, will yield better performance than a single node with 16gb and 4cpu ? Amazing info. Can you point me out to scientific data about that ?

Collapse
 
crisconru profile image
Crist贸bal Contreras Rubio

I saw a video in Youtube that recommended clustering with RPis using k3s

Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more