Of course, this is not new, it's already here centuries ago in the document https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Globa...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Yes, replace with a callback is pretty powerful. However, keep in mind that regular expressions are meant to solve regular problems and will easily fail on irregular tasks.
Also, your understanding of the syntax is slightly imcomplete, it actually is:
Captured matches are what you get from using parentheses in your RegExp. The position in the string like all string functions in JS counts UTF-16/-32 chars as multiple characters. Unlike a lot of other methods, the callback is not run in the scope of the object it is called on, so
this
will default to the global scope unless manually bound.Your code is not completely correct. The
index
variable in the callback is actually the position of the match in the string. So if the task is still matching the 2nd occurrence in the string, your code will fail for this string: "abcabca" and the index for each match will be0
,3
,8
and not0
,1
,2
. However, we can just add a variable to count the index of each occurrence so overall, nice discovery.Fun fact: That
index
variable is also accessible in the regex itself using the lastIndex property.Yeah, that's what I noticed after posted it here, to actually replace the nth match, we can write something like this:
Technically a "callback function" is one that's called at a later point in time, like asynchronously, as in "we'll call you back later".
In this case it's just a "function", nothing so exotic. This function is called immediately if/when a substitution is to be performed.
It's easy to understate how powerful a tool this can be though, so good article about using it!
Bro, you don't even need JS if you know how to write good regexs. #joke