That makes sense for .map(), but for .reduce() the previous value is also the accumulated value which will eventually be returned. Making that distinction in the naming convention is a nice visual cue imo.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
That makes sense for
.map(), but for.reduce()the previous value is also the accumulated value which will eventually be returned. Making that distinction in the naming convention is a nice visual cue imo.