I understand the balance act from the business side, as I work in the real world for large company. But given what happened, it is a go to example of why you shouldn't ignore large and obvious security flaws for any length of time. In the context of the story. The company hired security testers. Found out there was a huge (and relatively simple) problem. Did not fix it and experienced a worse case scenario. Which doesn't help in the "not lose business" side of things. You point is very valid and those business decisions can be difficult at times. But in the context of the story shared it is a prime example of the wrong choice.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Sometimes people choose earlier launching to not lose the business.
I understand the balance act from the business side, as I work in the real world for large company. But given what happened, it is a go to example of why you shouldn't ignore large and obvious security flaws for any length of time. In the context of the story. The company hired security testers. Found out there was a huge (and relatively simple) problem. Did not fix it and experienced a worse case scenario. Which doesn't help in the "not lose business" side of things. You point is very valid and those business decisions can be difficult at times. But in the context of the story shared it is a prime example of the wrong choice.