HTML itself is not turing complete. So it’s technically not a programming language. BUT when you mix CSS AND HTML they can be arguably turing complete.
I've never understood this argument. Where did the idea a programming language has to be turing complete to be a programming language, come from 😄
A good example is agda. Agda is a total language, its functions always terminate and cannot return a value other than the type specified. This property makes it non-turing complete.
I would still call it a programming language. There are many other examples.
I think Turing completeness is more important when determining if a language is a ‘general’ programming language as opposed to domain specific languages.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
HTML itself is not turing complete. So it’s technically not a programming language. BUT when you mix CSS AND HTML they can be arguably turing complete.
I've never understood this argument. Where did the idea a programming language has to be turing complete to be a programming language, come from 😄
A good example is agda. Agda is a total language, its functions always terminate and cannot return a value other than the type specified. This property makes it non-turing complete.
I would still call it a programming language. There are many other examples.
Agreed. I mean, even Pokemon Yellow is tiring complete
I think Turing completeness is more important when determining if a language is a ‘general’ programming language as opposed to domain specific languages.