Mh, the * selector is relatively very expensive: I would use it rather sparingly.
*
No. The * is the less expensive. Check some talk about performances by csswizardry
Googling quickly, they still seem to confirm it among the less efficient: csswizardry.com/2011/09/writing-ef...
8 years old post...
This one is much more resent and confirms that * is still more expensive: sitepoint.com/optimizing-css-id-se...
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Mh, the
*selector is relatively very expensive: I would use it rather sparingly.No. The * is the less expensive. Check some talk about performances by csswizardry
Googling quickly, they still seem to confirm it among the less efficient: csswizardry.com/2011/09/writing-ef...
8 years old post...
This one is much more resent and confirms that
*is still more expensive: sitepoint.com/optimizing-css-id-se...