I understand the POV of Free Software people, but they really choose an ambiguous name. If you have to explain the name: "as free as in beer", you have a bad name my friend.
If they wanted to be clear about freedom they should have used a language that made clear the distinction like LibreOffice crowd did.
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
what about licensing: (paid|freeware|opensource)?
I understand the POV of Free Software people, but they really choose an ambiguous name. If you have to explain the name: "as free as in beer", you have a bad name my friend.
If they wanted to be clear about freedom they should have used a language that made clear the distinction like LibreOffice crowd did.
The trouble with that is that you assume that licensing(paid) and licensing(opensource) are mutually exclusive, but they're not.
then:
Price: (free|paid)
Licencing: (propietary|opensource)
in any case, what FOSS sw is forcefully paid?, could FOSS sw be paid only? if you have all the ingredients how can you force a payment?
Great! I will update soon ;)
Done ;)