## DEV Community is a community of 756,805 amazing developers

We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.

# Discussion on: A Beginner Program I'm Rather Proud Of

## Replies for: Good work! Seems like a project that can grow with you, too, since you could change how you go about printing the grid.

Erik Anderson

Good point! It'd be interesting to make it print a grid with n rows and m columns (taking n, and m, integers). Or perhaps working on being line-efficient and expressive.
And thanks!

Rachel Soderberg • Edited on

I don't know python well, so I couldn't tell at a glance if it already did this, but my first thought was also that it could be a good exercise to change it to working recursively for n number of rows/cols

Erik Anderson

Interesting. There is currently no recursion. I had been thinking about adding the capability of printing n rows and m columns, but I was thinking of doing that through loops, not recursion. Do you have a quick description or example of what recursion might look like in this situation?

Rachel Soderberg

Good question - I'll think on that a bit and let you know! I had an idea that it would probably work but didn't really ponder it very hard.

Rachel Soderberg

Well, I couldn't articulate what I was thinking well without code, so I decided to take the opportunity for a little practice and wrote up a quick application that does basically what yours does (though I stuck to a single symbol for each "square" instead of building them nicely as you did. It's in C#, but hopefully you can still get the idea:

Erik Anderson

Cool! Thanks for thinking about it and I'm glad I instigated some practice.
The language barrier is pretty strong, but I do see a while loop, which makes sense. However, I don't see any recursive function calls. Though I'm not sure of the syntax for function definition in C#, so I may be missing something.
Or I may be mis-understanding recursion. According to what I've recently learned a program is working recursively when a function calls itself. Do I have that right?
A week or two ago I wrote a post on Dev about iterative vs recursive functions, which I had just learned and was excited about.
Based on my understanding as I laid it out in that post, and my (potentially incorrect) reading of your code, yours looks more like an iterative solution.
I'm digging into this because I'm particulary interested in your earlier comment that "it could be a good exercise to change it to working recursively for n number of rows/cols" because I don't understand what that would look like.
All of that being, it seems to me that an iterative solution makes sense here.