loading...

re: Basic monads in Javascript VIEW POST

FULL DISCUSSION
 

This looks a excellent library; looking forward to using this. Could you help with the following example?

const data = [
  { wrongName: 'Jason', level: 7, cool: true },
  { wrongName: 'Blanche', level: 8, cool: false }
]

Maybe(data)
  .map(people => people.filter(person => person.cool))
  .map(people => people[0])
  .map(person => person.name)
  .map(name => name.toUpperCase())
  .cata({
    Just: data => console.log(data), // JASON
    Nothing: () => console.log('No data available')
  })

this appears to give me a Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'toUpperCase'... but I imagined it might deal with the error in a similar way to Promises

 

For this example the following would be better if you weren't sure if some fields would be available

const data = [
  { wrongName: 'Jason', level: 7, cool: true },
  { wrongName: 'Blanche', level: 8, cool: false }
]

Maybe(data)
  .map(people => people.filter(person => person.cool))
  .chain(head)
  .chain(get(['name']))
  .map(name => name.toUpperCase())
  .cata({
    Just: data => console.log(data), // JASON
    Nothing: () => console.log('No data available')
  })
 

It seems to looks better with Ramda, isn't it:

const data = [
  { wrongName: 'Jason', level: 7, cool: true },
  { wrongName: 'Blanche', level: 8, cool: false }
];

Maybe(data)
  .map(filter(propEq('cool', true)))
  .map(head)
  .map(prop('name'))
  .map(toUpper)
  .cata({
    Just: console.log
    Nothing: () => console.log('No data available')
  })

PS: thanks a lot for the article

This isn't exactly the same because Ramdas prop() does not return a Maybe, so if that prop did not exist then ramda would return an undefined, which will cause problems down the line. Same with head()

You are totally right. Sorry for my mistake.

code of conduct - report abuse