loading...

re: Strive for simplicity VIEW POST

TOP OF THREAD FULL DISCUSSION
re: "[...] because with the comma was is stupid is the simple thing[...]" What?
 

there was a typo. I meant what is stupid, not was.

anyway, I rephrase it:

with the comma the stupid refers to the thing, (which is so simple that it is stupid), while with the comma the one being stupid is the developer.

is it more clear like this?
thanks for pointing out :-)

 

Almost!

with the comma... while with the comma

darn!
embarassed
without the comma!

code of conduct - report abuse