If really have to let me complain Rust, then that would be the feature: lifetime, unless 'a > 'b already be introduced into Rust. Except that, I think C++ allows we have full control of memory management(so we have several ways to do that, but I think this against with safe guarantee of Rust) which is very important in a very very special case, and of course not really matter for most users; I think that's why I use Rust most of time XD.
Features with safety built in are a bit like railings around the Grand Canyon rim. They keep you safe, but you can't rappel down to study the cliff face. For that, you'd have to climb over the railing...at which point, if you don't do it right, the safety feature kinda adds to the ways you can hurt yourself.
Or you just can't get over the railing, and there goes the geologic survey.
It's always a tradeoff, innit? XD
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
If really have to let me complain Rust, then that would be the feature: lifetime, unless
'a > 'balready be introduced into Rust. Except that, I think C++ allows we have full control of memory management(so we have several ways to do that, but I think this against with safe guarantee of Rust) which is very important in a very very special case, and of course not really matter for most users; I think that's why I use Rust most of time XD.Features with safety built in are a bit like railings around the Grand Canyon rim. They keep you safe, but you can't rappel down to study the cliff face. For that, you'd have to climb over the railing...at which point, if you don't do it right, the safety feature kinda adds to the ways you can hurt yourself.
Or you just can't get over the railing, and there goes the geologic survey.
It's always a tradeoff, innit? XD