Thanks for the comment! The unary function seems neat, I will definitely give Ramda a closer look :)
As for the second gotcha it is simply to illustrate that () => foo() cannot always be replaced by foo as a more "point-free" style. I hope it is clearer now.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Thanks for the comment! The
unary
function seems neat, I will definitely give Ramda a closer look :)As for the second gotcha it is simply to illustrate that
() => foo()
cannot always be replaced byfoo
as a more "point-free" style. I hope it is clearer now.