I clearly stated:
1) I'm not good at writing;
2) I don't like to write ;
3) I don't WANT to write;
4) I don't know more than other people,
5) I don't feel I've something to teach;
And in all these things you understood exactly the opposite.
I understand perfectly. From reading your comments:
1) You are good enough at writing.
2) You obviously DO know more than other people.
3) You obviously DO have plenty to teach.
4) And you DO like writing well enough to complain and reply to everyone else.
In the time you've taken writing your first rant and all your replies you could have written something actually constructive and helpful.
I understand perfectly. From reading your comments:
1) You are good enough at writing.
2) You obviously DO know more than other people.
3) You obviously DO have plenty to teach.
4) And you DO like writing well enough to complain and reply to everyone else.
In the time you've taken writing your first rant and all your replies you could have written something actually constructive and helpful.
I understand perfectly. From reading your comments:
1) You ARE good enough at writing.
2) You obviously DO know more than other people.
3) You obviously DO have plenty to teach.
4) And you DO like writing well enough to complain and reply to everyone else.
In the time you've taken writing your first rant and all your replies you could have written something actually constructive and helpful.
There's a HUGE difference between writing a comment and writing a post, and it's not only the time spent on the activity - If you fail to see it, that's might be a reason for the overall decline of post quality.
I'm also failing to see the the "actually constructive and helpful" part of your comments, so... Have a nice day, see you around
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I clearly stated:
1) I'm not good at writing;
2) I don't like to write ;
3) I don't WANT to write;
4) I don't know more than other people,
5) I don't feel I've something to teach;
And in all these things you understood exactly the opposite.
I understand perfectly. From reading your comments:
1) You are good enough at writing.
2) You obviously DO know more than other people.
3) You obviously DO have plenty to teach.
4) And you DO like writing well enough to complain and reply to everyone else.
In the time you've taken writing your first rant and all your replies you could have written something actually constructive and helpful.
Less espresso dude.
I understand perfectly. From reading your comments:
1) You are good enough at writing.
2) You obviously DO know more than other people.
3) You obviously DO have plenty to teach.
4) And you DO like writing well enough to complain and reply to everyone else.
In the time you've taken writing your first rant and all your replies you could have written something actually constructive and helpful.
Less espresso dude.
I understand perfectly. From reading your comments:
1) You ARE good enough at writing.
2) You obviously DO know more than other people.
3) You obviously DO have plenty to teach.
4) And you DO like writing well enough to complain and reply to everyone else.
In the time you've taken writing your first rant and all your replies you could have written something actually constructive and helpful.
Less espresso dude.
There's a HUGE difference between writing a comment and writing a post, and it's not only the time spent on the activity - If you fail to see it, that's might be a reason for the overall decline of post quality.
I'm also failing to see the the "actually constructive and helpful" part of your comments, so... Have a nice day, see you around