Thanks for the nice example, I'm borrowing some ideas for my open source Elm SPA I'm developing as I'm still a Elm newbie.
But I'm wondering about the use of Task,map instead of Cmd.batch, it seems that causes all requests to be done in sequence instead of in parallel. For example the list of articles and the list of tags are loaded after each other instead of in parallel. Is there anyway to fix that and keep using Tasks?
Not yet, but I expect there will be something in Http to parallelize HTTP requests in the future.
Since it's just a performance optimization and performance is fine as-is, I thought it'd be prematurely optimization to go out of my way to use Cmd.batch instead, but in a world where I can parallelize via Http I'd reach for that instead of Task.map2 assuming it would be an easy upgrade. :)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Thanks for the nice example, I'm borrowing some ideas for my open source Elm SPA I'm developing as I'm still a Elm newbie.
But I'm wondering about the use of Task,map instead of Cmd.batch, it seems that causes all requests to be done in sequence instead of in parallel. For example the list of articles and the list of tags are loaded after each other instead of in parallel. Is there anyway to fix that and keep using Tasks?
Not yet, but I expect there will be something in
Httpto parallelize HTTP requests in the future.Since it's just a performance optimization and performance is fine as-is, I thought it'd be prematurely optimization to go out of my way to use
Cmd.batchinstead, but in a world where I can parallelize viaHttpI'd reach for that instead ofTask.map2assuming it would be an easy upgrade. :)