Here is my Rust solution! I think my answer is pretty good except I should be using a better data structure than a Vec here, since I really want to push/pop from both ends. If I did that I would be able to avoid needing to sort and reverse my vec, which would help on the processing speed!

fntwice_linear(size:usize)->Vec<u32>{letmutprocessed:Vec<u32>=vec![];letmutunprocessed:Vec<u32>=vec![];letmutcurrent=1;whileprocessed.len()<size{processed.push(current);// This block of code is NOT the most effiecient// I should switch to a data store that can push/pop// from both ends effieciently, as to avoid needing// the sort AND the revserseunprocessed.push(current*2+1);unprocessed.push(current*3+1);unprocessed.sort();unprocessed=unprocessed.iter().rev().cloned().collect();current=unprocessed.pop().unwrap();}processed}pubfntwice_linear_at(u:usize)->u32{twice_linear(u+1).pop().unwrap()}#[cfg(test)]modtests{usecrate::*;#[test]fnit_works_for_the_base_cases(){assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(0),1);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(1),3);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(2),4);}#[test]fnit_works_for_the_example(){assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(3),7);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(4),9);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(5),10);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(6),13);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(7),15);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(8),19);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(9),21);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(10),22);assert_eq!(twice_linear_at(11),27);}#[test]fnit_can_also_return_the_vec(){assert_eq!(twice_linear(12),vec![1,3,4,7,9,10,13,15,19,21,22,27]);}}

## re: Daily Challenge #13 - Twice Linear VIEW POST

FULL DISCUSSIONHere is my Rust solution! I think my answer is pretty good except I should be using a better data structure than a

`Vec`

here, since I really want to push/pop from both ends. If I did that I would be able to avoid needing to sort and reverse my vec, which would help on the processing speed!Take a look at std::collections::VecDeque :)

Thank you! I knew there was one that fit the bill better!