I appreciate seeing the more complex side, but complex pseudo-code isn’t the focus of the article, and presenting it as the first example makes the reader think the complex stuff is what pseudo-code -really- is— and that the simpler example is just “dumbed down”.
Maybe it would help if the examples were used in a different way? Like, “pseudo-code can be simple [example] or complex [example], but it’s overall goal is to...”
Thanks for the article! It answered a few questions I had 😊
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Why did you bother posting academic pseudo code? It ruins the opportunity to share the article to someone who is learning
It's just there as another example of what pseudo-code can look like and just how complex it can be if you need it. 🙂
I see both sides here.
I appreciate seeing the more complex side, but complex pseudo-code isn’t the focus of the article, and presenting it as the first example makes the reader think the complex stuff is what pseudo-code -really- is— and that the simpler example is just “dumbed down”.
Maybe it would help if the examples were used in a different way? Like, “pseudo-code can be simple [example] or complex [example], but it’s overall goal is to...”
Thanks for the article! It answered a few questions I had 😊