I'm in favour of email services charging $0.02 per email sent. Recipients as beneficiaries.
It would reduce waste by a large portion. Worse than carbon, its human time lost on tons of useless messages...
Interesting idea and I know the idea comes from good intentions, yet I don't see it working primarily because of:
People already pay enough for:
Fees for the above services already factor in wholesale bandwidth.
If we go down this path we may as well charge for:
Give them an inch and they (the powers that be) will take a mile, eventually.
Why not focus on bigger wins such as Video and Audio streaming services?
Watch less, listen to less, consume less - sounds like a good idea of course until we realise that not everyone uses these mediums the same way and that means some people will be penalised over others.
Definitely agree on reducing your email footprint but once we start imposing fees per send then slope gets very slippery and it becomes ripe for corruption and gate keeping while potentially not having the result we want.
It should be an optional feature available for email users.
When someone sends a message, they'll receive an auto-reply asking to pay the fee. The message would stay in a cache for a few days, then auto-deleted if the fee is not paid. A "whitelist" would allow friends & family to bypass the paywall.
That doesn't solve the problem. Horrible idea no matter how anyone looks at it, sorry. This has way more downsides than upsides.
Sorry, but isn't anyone quite a few people for you to speak on behalf of? Would solve my problem... But I agree it's not a good-looking idea 😉
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
We strive for transparency and don't collect excess data.