Just to note that Set values are compared by reference for uniqueness - this can catch you out if your Array contains objects rather than primitive types
Great advice! But how can we consider objects as duplicates even if they have same properties when they are passed by reference. So I think objects case is not applicable to this problem.
If you considered these objects duplicates [{id:1}, {id:1}], the Set approach won't suit. In this case though you'd probably need to use a utility library like Lodash: _.uniqWith(objects, _.isEqual)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Just to note that
Setvalues are compared by reference for uniqueness - this can catch you out if your Array contains objects rather than primitive typesGreat advice! But how can we consider objects as duplicates even if they have same properties when they are passed by reference. So I think objects case is not applicable to this problem.
If you considered these objects duplicates
[{id:1}, {id:1}], the Set approach won't suit. In this case though you'd probably need to use a utility library like Lodash:_.uniqWith(objects, _.isEqual)