Negative examples: MSDN (with the "DWORD dwFlags -- a dword containing flags" style of descriptions) and Boost - where each library has it's own unique style of documentation and usually lacks badly on EXPLAINING the usage of the library in the right way.
So many comments and nobody mentioned Qt?
Qt docs are rather detailed and very helpful.
Negative examples: MSDN (with the "DWORD dwFlags -- a dword containing flags" style of descriptions) and Boost - where each library has it's own unique style of documentation and usually lacks badly on EXPLAINING the usage of the library in the right way.
i wish i could filter them from my google searches. and do not forget the terrible automatic translations