Yes, looks like it
(async () => { const moduleSpecifier = './utils.mjs'; const module = await import(moduleSpecifier) module.default(); // → logs 'Hi from the default export!' module.doStuff(); // → logs 'Doing stuff…' })();
you could even
(async () => { const moduleSpecifier = './utils.mjs'; const { default: utils, doStuff } = await import(moduleSpecifier) utils(); // → logs 'Hi from the default export!' doStuff(); // → logs 'Doing stuff…' })();
Which is similar to the static syntax
import { default as utils, doStuff } from './utils.js';
I presume you could do something like this?
const moduleImport = async (loc, callback) => { const module = await import(loc); callback(module); } moduleImport("./dog", ({ bark }) => { bark("Hello World") });
How is this better than just using a promise, as shown in the post?
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Yes, looks like it
you could even
Which is similar to the static syntax
I presume you could do something like this?
How is this better than just using a promise, as shown in the post?