Well, sure they're atomic values. But atom isn't a type in Lisp. I didn't want to additionally correct you on your use of the word atom, because I felt it was needlessly pedantic at the time, but I see now it's the crux of the confusion. The proper term for would be symbols. Those are the things that have the single quote in front of them and can represent identifiers when used to express the syntax of Lisp itself. Atoms, which is a term you could use to classify anything that's not an aggregate container, would include functions, strings, symbols, etc.
But if I told you that Python only had three data types, dict, array, and atom, wouldn't you wonder why I've collapsed string, int, float, etc into one type?
Aren't functions, strings, and numbers just particular kinds of atoms?
Well, sure they're atomic values. But atom isn't a type in Lisp. I didn't want to additionally correct you on your use of the word atom, because I felt it was needlessly pedantic at the time, but I see now it's the crux of the confusion. The proper term for would be symbols. Those are the things that have the single quote in front of them and can represent identifiers when used to express the syntax of Lisp itself. Atoms, which is a term you could use to classify anything that's not an aggregate container, would include functions, strings, symbols, etc.
But if I told you that Python only had three data types, dict, array, and atom, wouldn't you wonder why I've collapsed string, int, float, etc into one type?
Thanks for the clarification, Mike! I need to do some more research...
No problem. To help your research, I might write up a post from a talk I have given a couple of times about this exact topic.