Love the approach of breaking down myths! Excellent point especially about taking the prefers reduced motion too far.
It's neat that you broke this down into several mini-articles; as it stands, though, their titles do not actually match the content. That is, in the feed I see an article titled "Accessible websites are ugly", but the article is actually about how that's a myth; to some that might feel clickbaity 😕
That is a great point about the title. I should definitely update them. How about adding "Myth: " at the beginning of each title? That way, it would be something like "Myth: Accessible websites are ugly", which would make it clearer what the content is about. Suggestions?
I updated the mini-articles with the "Myth: " thing. Hopefully they look better and not so clickbaity now. The only one I didn't update was the "No ARIA > Bad ARIA" as I don't want people to think that's a myth (more of a missing part in the equation)
Love the approach of breaking down myths! Excellent point especially about taking the prefers reduced motion too far.
It's neat that you broke this down into several mini-articles; as it stands, though, their titles do not actually match the content. That is, in the feed I see an article titled "Accessible websites are ugly", but the article is actually about how that's a myth; to some that might feel clickbaity 😕
Thanks! 😊
That is a great point about the title. I should definitely update them. How about adding "Myth: " at the beginning of each title? That way, it would be something like "Myth: Accessible websites are ugly", which would make it clearer what the content is about. Suggestions?
I updated the mini-articles with the "Myth: " thing. Hopefully they look better and not so clickbaity now. The only one I didn't update was the "No ARIA > Bad ARIA" as I don't want people to think that's a myth (more of a missing part in the equation)
Yep, prepending "Myth: " was definitely the first thing I thought of too!