Also, I'd recommend that you recommend that as the preferred version as it is also the fastest (the map version is 6.9% slower than a normal for loop, the forEach one is 25% slower). This has no bearing on this example with 2 entries, but getting people into the habbit of using the faster choice will benefit us all in the long run.
Hi Luca, may I suggest changing the 3rd alternative to the following, I think you can do without the temporary variables there:
Also, I'd recommend that you recommend that as the preferred version as it is also the fastest (the map version is 6.9% slower than a normal for loop, the forEach one is 25% slower). This has no bearing on this example with 2 entries, but getting people into the habbit of using the faster choice will benefit us all in the long run.
Thank you Anders, your reply is awesome!