Agile is the opposite of waterfall. Waterfall is based on the "failure is not an option" dictum. Agile is based on "failure is the only option" dictum.
Any team who is not working following the "failure is the only option" dictum is not doing agile. It's as simple as that. No need to make it "Buddhist" or any other similarly silly complication.
Agile is the opposite of waterfall. Waterfall is based on the "failure is not an option" dictum. Agile is based on "failure is the only option" dictum.
Any team who is not working following the "failure is the only option" dictum is not doing agile. It's as simple as that. No need to make it "Buddhist" or any other similarly silly complication.
+1 great point
Why is it silly to compare secular Buddhism and Agile? Both are non-religious philosophies that
In fact, I deep dive right into why “retrospective meetings” are not dumb and in fact are one of the healthiest things you can do:
Fixing Bad Habits By Learning To Love Them: Agile Retrospectives
Cubicle Buddha ・ May 15 ・ 5 min read
Not silly to compare it. But I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor, so I prefer not adding complexity.