Static websites are on the rise due to their server rendering and progress approach. Devs are choosing one static site generator to another to keep their clients flexible. If found none, they develop their own.
I want to know, what's wrong with developing plain static web sites as same as the 90s which have .html extension in their URLs? We can make them too part static and part dynamic as we do while generating PWAs. What's ugly with URLs which end up with an extension like .html, .php, and .aspx?
Thank you very much for your time.