Seems the problem is not in concat, but in = itself. As I can see map of concat is even faster than push
console.time('how long'); var arBig = [...Array(10000).keys()].map( function(step) { return arr1.concat(arr2); }); console.log(arBig.length); console.timeEnd('how long');
Plz check jsperf.com/javascript-array-concat...
Not comparable: the concat mapper creates 10000 arrays of 20 item arrays, while the other functions create an array of 100010 items.
Ahh, indeed! Well, with reduce-concat timing became the same as arr1 = arr1.concat :(
console.time('how long'); var arBig = [...Array(10000).keys()].reduce( function(acc, val) { return acc.concat(arr2); }, arr1); console.log(arBig.length); console.timeEnd('how long');
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Seems the problem is not in concat, but in = itself.
As I can see map of concat is even faster than push
Plz check jsperf.com/javascript-array-concat...
Not comparable: the concat mapper creates 10000 arrays of 20 item arrays, while the other functions create an array of 100010 items.
Ahh, indeed!
Well, with reduce-concat timing became the same as arr1 = arr1.concat :(